Subject: Re: Final (?) Version.
From: pedro mercadante <mercadan@fnal.gov>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:04:27 -0300
To: Greg Landsberg <landsberg@hep.brown.edu>
CC: "'Sergio M. Lietti'" <lietti@fnal.gov>

Hi Greg,
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Looks good. A few comments:
>
> 0) Put page numbers - it would make it easier for people to comment during
> your presentation.
>
>
Ok
> 1) P2 - PYTHIA is misspelled;
>
>
Ok
> 2) P7 - CTEQ5L is misspelled;
>
>
Ok
> 3) So, all the "right-hand" plots are after the "best" cuts, not just the SS
> requirement?
>
>
No, it is just the SS requirement. Maybe I should put the plots before the comment on cuts. They motivate the cuts. > 4) State signal significance and expected yield after these cuts.
>
>
Ok, the signal significance is easy. I can try to state the yield with a few more UED points.
> 5) I think what you put for the SS dimuons is sufficient.
>
Ok.
> 6) In the conclusions I'd also emphasize SS e-mu channel, not just SS
> dimuons.
>
>
I guess you are right. Maybe e-mu could be a very good channel as they have different characteristic and maybe they kill the jet bg in different way.What about e e? Should be a little harder?
> Greg
>
>
>
Pedro.