Difference: PeMe012 ( vs. 1)

Revision 12006-11-16 - SergioLietti

Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="AnalysisUED"
Subject: Re: Final (?) Version.
From: pedro mercadante <mercadan@fnal.gov>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:04:27 -0300
To: Greg Landsberg <landsberg@hep.brown.edu>
CC: "'Sergio M. Lietti'" <lietti@fnal.gov>

Hi Greg,
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Looks good. A few comments:
>
> 0) Put page numbers - it would make it easier for people to comment during
> your presentation.
>
>
Ok
> 1) P2 - PYTHIA is misspelled;
>
>
Ok
> 2) P7 - CTEQ5L is misspelled;
>
>
Ok
> 3) So, all the "right-hand" plots are after the "best" cuts, not just the SS
> requirement?
>
>
No, it is just the SS requirement. Maybe I should put the plots before the comment on cuts. They motivate the cuts. > 4) State signal significance and expected yield after these cuts.
>
>
Ok, the signal significance is easy. I can try to state the yield with a few more UED points.
> 5) I think what you put for the SS dimuons is sufficient.
>
Ok.
> 6) In the conclusions I'd also emphasize SS e-mu channel, not just SS
> dimuons.
>
>
I guess you are right. Maybe e-mu could be a very good channel as they have different characteristic and maybe they kill the jet bg in different way.What about e e? Should be a little harder?
> Greg
>
>
>
Pedro.

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback

antalya escort bursa escort eskisehir escort istanbul escort izmir escort