Difference: GrLa009 ( vs. 1)

Revision 12006-11-16 - SergioLietti

Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="AnalysisUED"
Subject: RE: New version
From: Greg Landsberg <landsberg@hep.brown.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:41:32 -0400
To: 'pedro mercadante' <mercadan@fnal.gov>
CC: "'Sergio M. Lietti'" <lietti@fnal.gov>

Hi Pedro,

Looks good, thanks! A few questions:

1) On the set of plots showing two backgrounds and the signal, I'd rather normalize everything to the predicted cross section (and use log plot if needed). That would give a clear clue to as how much larger the backgrounds are than the signal, and also how much they are reduced by the likesign requirement.

2) Add a plot of likesign pair invariant mass distribution for the set with likesign cut. (You can put it in the first row on p. 11, to the right of the opposite-sign mass distribution.)

3) Judging by your plots, reasonable cuts to try would be: - pT(leading lepton) < 30 GeV;
- M(opposite sign pair) < 80 GeV for every opposite-sign pair in the event;
- MET > 10-15 GeV;
- Njet(ET > 15 GeV) > 0 and Sum jet ET > 30 GeV;

Regards,

Greg

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback

antalya escort bursa escort eskisehir escort istanbul escort izmir escort